i need the answer quickly
Expert Answer
CommentFor the purpose of this exercise, I have attended a campus meeting regarding final placement. During the meeting, I took notes and observed the group and discussion. The meeting's agenda was final placement-related concerns and 10 student representatives and a professor coordinator participated in the meeting held on the campus.
a. My evaluation of the meeting is based upon the group's constructive discussion, leader's consideration, and the result of the meeting. I would rate the meeting 9 on the scale of 10 based upon the constructive and conclusive agenda of the meeting, pre-decided by the professor coordinator regarding addressing the placement agenda and work-flow to all participants The professor coordinator (leader) was very clear with the agenda and allowed the participants to brainstorm each-other and understand the issue The regular interaction and intermediation helped the group to discuss the issue and come up with the constructive and conclusive ideas to fasten-up the placement process The group dynamics also helped in decision making considering participant's different streams, class and though of school The group also helped each-other in understanding the issue and participates in healthy discussion for the issue of placements. The workflow and deadlines were decided during the meeting and the leader also encouraged all participants. Thus I would rate the meeting 9 on a scale of 10.
b The group members made their decisions based on the group consensus Each idea was made understood to all participants and their consensus was asked The brainstorming process helped in the modification of Ideas and consensus was reached to make a decision All participants were allowed to present their understanding the idea and provide their inputs to make it better and helpful to college.
c. The individual participation was pretty considering the regular intermediation by the leader, motivating all members to participate and provide input on the ideas The participants also engaged in the process of asking each other and consensus making process The participation by each member of the group and questioning idea with brainstorming the ideas was seen in the meeting, thus indicating the fact all participants listened to each-other well and provided their input for each idea
d. The brainstorming process helped all participants to present an idea with favorable results and consensus of all participants helped the idea to be implemented The issue of changing the vote or changing the view during the meeting wasn’t seen because of the time given for the meeting, clear agenda and brainstorming among participants and by the leader.
e. The meeting was very constructive and fruitful based on the conclusion and the barriers to communication weren't noticed by me at the meeting The leader participated and intermediated the meeting very constructively, every participant put forwarded their pomt-of-view and helped in brainstorming that lead to decision making The participants were having sufficient knowledge of issues, excellent communication skills of all participants, attentive participants and leader were the main highlights of the meeting
f.The difference between my friend and my notes is related to the communication process and points consideration We both have pointed out the points of the meeting and noted down our understanding with observations I notice very little difference in the presentation of meeting's agenda and the discussion I understand the difference considering the different idea of presentation by both of us considering the fact that both of us were observing group from a distance and with different mind of perspective, and thus difference In written presentation is justified
ليست هناك تعليقات:
إرسال تعليق